The crisis of kingship
During the fourteenth century, towards the end of the Middles Ages, there
was a continous struggle between the king and his nolbles. The first crisis
came in 1327 when Edward II was deposed and cruelly murdered. His eleven-year-old
son, Edward III, became king, and as soon as he could, he punished those responsible.
But the principle that kins were neither to be killed nor deposed was broken. o9i24id
Towards the end of the fourteenth century Richard II was the second king to
be killed by ambitious lords. He made himself extremely unpopular by his choice
of advisers. This was alwais a difficult matter, because the king’s aadvisers
became powerful, and those not chosen lost influence and wealth. Some of Richard’s
strongest critics had been the most powerful men in the kingdom.
Richard was young and proud. He quarreled with these nobles in 1388, and used
his authority to humble them. He imprisoned his uncle, John of Gaunt, the third
son of Edward III, who was the most powerful and wealthy noble of his time.
John of Gaunt died in prison. Other nobles, including John of Gaunt’s
son, Henry duke of Lancaster, did not forget or forgive. In 1399, when Richard
II was busy trying to establish royal authority again in Ireland, they rebelled.
Henry of Lancaster, who had left England, returned and raised an army. Richard
was deposed.
Unlike Edward III, however, Richard II had no children. There were two possible
successors. One was the earl of March, the seven-year-old grandson of Edward
III’s son. The other was Henry of Lancaster, son of John of Gaunt. It
was difficult to say which had the better claim to the throne. But Henry was
stronger. He won the support of other powereful nobles and took the crown by
force. Richard died in mysteriously soon after.
Henry IV spent the rest of his reign establishing his royal authority. But although
he passe the crown to his son peacefully, he had sown the seeds of civil war.
Half a century later the nobility would be divided between those who supported
his family, the “Lancastrians”, and those who supported the family
of the earl of March, the “Yorkists”.
Wales in revolt
Edward I had conquered Wales in the 1280s, and colonised it. He brought English
people to enlarge small towns. Pembrokishire, in the far southwest, even became
known as “the little England beyond Wales”. Edward’s officers
drove many of the Welsh into the hills, and gave their land to English farmers.
Many Welsh were forced to join the English army, not because they wanted to
serve the English but because they had lost their lands and needed to live.
They fought in Scotland and in France, and taught the English their skill with
the longbow.
A century later the Welsh found a man who was ready to rebel against the English
king and whome they were willing to follow. Owain Glyndwr was the first and
only Welsh prince to have wide and popular support in every part of Wales. In
fact it was he who created the idea of a Welsh nation. He was descended from
two royal families, which had rules in different parts of Wales before the Normans
came.
Owain Glyndwr’s rebellion did not start as a national revolt. At first
he joined the revolt of Norman-Welsh border lords who had always tried to be
free of royal control. But after ten years of war Owain Glyndwr’s border
rebellion had developed in to a national war, and in 1400 he was proclaimed
Prince of Wales by his supporters. However, Owain Glyndwr was not strong enough
to defeat the English armies sent agains him. He continued to fight a successful
guerrila war, which made the control of Wales an extrmely expensive problem
for the English. But after 1410 Owain Glyndwr lost almost all his support as
Welsh people realised that however hard they fought they would never be free
of the English. Glyndwr was never captured, but he created a feeling of national
identity.